Book a consultation
My approach to AI is not purely academic. I work hands-on with AI tools every day, and I bring that practical understanding into every adoption engagement. I am independent: I am not a partner or reseller for any AI vendor, and I do not sell licences or technical integration services.
When I advise organisations on AI adoption, I need to deeply understand at least one platform — not just what it can do, but how it behaves, where it falls short, and what it demands from the people and processes around it. Surface-level familiarity with many tools is not enough to give honest, practical advice.
This means I can help you think clearly about:
I have chosen Anthropic’s Claude as my primary working tool and as the foundation for the Adoption Risk Radar. This is not a default — it is a deliberate decision based on how I work, what I advise on, and what I believe responsible AI adoption requires.
Claude is built with safety, honesty, and transparency as core principles. That matters when I help organisations in regulated industries navigate EU AI Act requirements: the advice I give rests on a platform whose design supports it.
The Adoption Risk Radar is built on the Claude API, and I use Claude Code for prototyping and automation. This hands-on experience means I understand the practical realities of working with AI — not just the theory.
I also work with other AI tools where relevant, including Microsoft Copilot and Google NotebookLM. But depth beats breadth: Claude is the platform I know most deeply and use most consistently.